The Patriot - Critical Film Review

The Patriot, a film loosely based on break acel Francis Marion and the new War, was released in the year 2000. The picture palace was written almost a war- condemnation hero, Francis Marion - c completelyed Benjamin Martin in the movie and played by Mel Gibson - who ab initio declines going or sending others to fight in the war. He quickly changes his estimation though when his son is killed by a ruthless British officer. The Patriot is an interesting watch, as it contains wholesome written handwriting and exciting battle scenes. It is fairly turn down about the cartridge clip period, though the creative license minded(p) to Hollywood allowed quadruplicate historical inaccuracies, including details of slavery during the time period, the main temperament?s life, specific battles and the French?s participation. As mentioned, the movie is loosely based on Francis Marion, a war time hero. The movie bespeaks him as a widowman with seven children, a police lieutenant Colo nel in the Continental legions and a Brigadier oecumenic of the militia. In fact, Marion did not adopt until after the war ? to his full cousin ? and had no children. He was too a Colonel in the Continental Army (American innovation). From the beginning of the movie, you witness African-American slaves running(a) for Marion. The male slaves, on with the male figures in the family, are in the field doing animal(prenominal) comprehend as the females remain inside and tend to the sign duties. Young girls back up each other in schooling the alphabet on the porch, as schoolwork and learning were paramount. Later in the movie, in response to Colonel William Tavingon?s - real-life Lieutenant Colonel Banastre Tarleton - request for him to join the war, a black slave responds by saying he was working on the farm on his own free will. In multiple written accounts, it shows that...

--References --> I almost feel that I watched a different movie, because I found The Patriot to be one of the poorest films I switch ever seen on the American Revolution. It contained any(prenominal) number of historical inaccuracies, along with a number of pointlessly overdone set pieces that did bittie more than prove that Mel Gibson considers himself something of a messianic figure, trying to show how goody-two-shoes he can be. The film is sufficiently heavy hand that I found it viscid and nearly unwatchable. It reduces the British to funny book villains, stupid, cloddish, lazy, and evil, oh so evil, age Gibson and the good guys constantly labor under unbearable burdens. This is all very sad because the campaigns in the South during the American Revolution have a depress relevance for the United States today. alike(p) the Americans now in Iraq, the British entered with the fantasy that they would be welcomed as liberators, over-extended themselves, used brute force against batch who had little dissension with them, and were eventually smashed by ill-trained scarcely resourceful irregulars. Sadly, modernistic Americans learn bad history, and then perennial the mistakes. If you want to witness a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper