Feedback Stress: Does Auditory Feedback Negatively Affect Performance o

The Stroop EffectIn his historic study, Stroop found that reading divulges of change interfered with individuals ability to figure the ink colouring material the word was printed in when the two differed (i.e., the word blueing written in red ink) (1935). However, the basis of this phenomenon can be traced underpin to Cattell who found that naming shows and pictures took twice as long to meet than reading the word these glossarys or pictures represented (1886). He reason out that this was due to reading being an automatic process while identifying comments or pictures requires a conscious effort (Cattell, 1886). MacLeod (1991) reflects that it was Cattells work which powerfully influenced future psychologist including Stroop.In his experiment, Stroop investigated how the reaction eon to name colors change magnitude when it conflicted with the automatic process of reading. He broke down his experiment into common chord parts. In the first, he tested how reading the name of a color printed in a different ink color (i.e., BLUE) differed from reading the name of a color printed in black ink (i.e., BLUE). The difference betwixt the name of the color and the ink color it was printed in caused a sharp fray resulting in an increased reaction time of 2.3 numbers (Stroop, 1935). In the second part of his experiment, Stroop (1935) looked at reaction time differences between naming the color of solid blocks (i.e., ) versus naming the color of the ink not the name of the color (i.e., responding RED for BLUE). He found that participants required 74% more time to name the color of the ink when it did not agree with the name of the color (Stroop, 1935). Stroop concluded that it was the interference between the automatic process of reading the na... ...oop An interference task specialized for functional neuroimaging validation study with functional MRI. homo Brain Mapping, 6(4), 270-282. doi 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0193(1998)64Cattell, J. M. (1886). The time it takes to see and name objects. Mind, 11(41), 63-65.MacLeod, C. M. (1991). half(a) a century of research on the Stroop Effect An integrative review. psychological Bulletin, 109(2), 163-203. doi 10.1037/0033-2909.109.2.163Richards, A., French, C. C., Johnson, W. Naparstek, J., & Williams, J. (1992). Effects of mood manipulation and anxiety on slaying of an emotional Stroop task. British Journal of Psychology, 83, 479-491.Shor, R. E. (1975). An auditory analog of the Stroop test. Journal of widely distributed Psychology, 93, 281-288.Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18(6), 643-662.