Who Decided

Nehal HousnyBasic Composition Kathy WilfordNovember 5, 2012 Who Decides? Medical Technologies (MT) is an essential means when it comes to science . However, in that location memorizems to be a misunderstanding on who should fetch the cause to contain its use. The three most common figures that atomic number 18 norm altogethery involved in misrepresentling MTs be the regimen, bear ons, and society. each(prenominal) representative has its goledge advantages and disadvantages . In both es interprets ,The Made to Order deli reallyman by Lisa Belkin and Who Holds the Clicker by Lauren woodlouse , checkup engineering science summonss are mould to death yet encloseled and regulated differently.Every figure has its take guidelines as to how to control this technology and at quantify on that point was no control at some(prenominal) . Medical practices are very important and sometimes necessary to take over a patients life . With proper reinforcement from the po litics , doctors should drive home the assurance to control how medical technology is used. In the Made to Order rescuer by Lisa Belkin , doctors were able to control medical practices used in the patients life. unluckily , they received little or no funds from the political sympathies.Belkin felt that doctors lacked control because they were being held gumption from the disposal . For example, Dr Mark Hughees was one the first doctors who helped Strongin Goldbergs and the Nashes family specify a cure for their children Henry and Molly. His brilliance and ever-lasting experience caused much of his look for to be supported by the government , but not for alike long. It was however so soon that social intercourse decided to stop financial backing Hughess query , which eventually affected the lives of Henry and Molly. Hughes then continued his research through private funds.Belkin states at the time he was also a member of a federal advisory committee that developed guid elines for single-cell fertilized egg analysis that was central to PGD. But no sooner had those guidelines been developed than Congress banned all federal financing of embryo research , and Hughes was military press to continue his research with private funds only(6). This shows that the doctors work is not al itinerarys supported and can be affected by the governments decisions. The government is controlling and limiting the doctors ability to use medical technology .By halt financial funds necessary to continue research the chances of finding new-fangled cures slightens by a great chance . This can also be considered injurious to the patients life because it leaves questions unanswered . On the other hand , in Who Holds the Clicker by Lauren Slater , doctors were able to receive adequate funding from the government to expand the use of medical technology . The government here(predicate) precept the benefits of medical technology to the point were they took control of it. B y willingly sponsoring doctors , this technology was soon uses as a management device. e .This potentially put pressure on the doctors because on that point funding was still limited which do no room for mistakes or seconds chances. Slater states Beyond questions of whether a several(prenominal) mentally ill patient can provide informed consent, there continue to hover fears that DBS could fall into the hands of the state, or the overworked prison system, and be used as a management device(242). As mentioned in the context of the essay, it is understood that the phrase management device refers to power and the content to dominate. Here, the government saw an opportunity to utilize the tools of medical technology to control the population.One example of how the government motiveed to use medical technology to clear up power is to try and wipe come in delirium. Slater states The potential uses and abuses of neural implants were obvious You could control prison populations you could effectively wipe out violence (236). They targeted current races and populations, such as African Americans. Their excuse to use medical technology was to wipe out violence from the African American race. erst trance again, this proves that the doctors are the ones who should be in charge of medical practices. With a doctor, there is no exchange of benefits with his or her patients.The doctor does not desire power or management to cure a patient. Instead, a doctor call for experience, passion, and the will to decide when and how to use medical technology. In both Belkin and Slaters essays the government is seen as an obstacle to suspend the doctors be in control of their own job. Government is looking for trends on how to control the muckle no matter if it is providing funds or not. Peoples lives should not be based on what the governments visions are . The use of medical technology should stand in the hands of the doctors with no pressure included.Neurosurgeon Rees Co sgrove stated If we do not do this good and carefully, and , you know properly I do not think we will entertain another opportunity(242). There is a certain amount of pressure on the doctors shoulders to perfect these experiments and devices. Because there is no time for trial and break doctors are not able to test the procedure several times before actually executing it . There are no fleshly models of DBS for anxiety or depression, so these forays into the human brains are largely unguided despite all the high tech equipment(242).Once again, government is limiting the doctors pickaxs creating less precise results for their research. Spending so much time with anyone creates a certain level of attachment, let alone between a doctor and his or her patient. This attachment or bond can expedite the curing occlusive of a patient. For example, Belkin states They Henrys parents took on Dr. Hughes problems as their own, bonding with him secretly , know that they needed him to bon d if they were to save Henry(10).Here, it is obvious that Henrys parents are proudly desperate to find a cure for their son to the point where they are willing to deal with Henrys doctors private problems. Concerning over one anothers issues and move to lift a burden always increases productivity and positivity. Slater also states When Mario talks near that time now , tears come to his eyes. It was like a miracle,he says. I still have some OCD symptoms but way , way less. Dr Greenberg and Ramussen saved my life. (241) It is clear that as long there is good dialogue between the patient and the doctor, progress comes easier . overly, when the doctor has full control of the detail in terms of knowing the patients past habits, pain issues, and diagnosis he or she can provide a specific solution. They not only master helping every(prenominal) patients life but also read to bond with most of them . This makes it more personal which can result in a positive way. Doctors should be a ble to receive proper funding since it is for sake of saving lives and advancing cures. As mentioned, doctors are reputable people with knowledge of how medical procedures should be carries .There are regulations that are given to every patient before the procedure. For example, Belkin states That was apparently what Hughess gut told him , too, and he concur to try and develop a lab procedure to screen HLA a the single-cell level. His shareageicipation came with certain conditions. First , that the mother essential be younger than 35, because younger women produce more eggs, increasing the odds of a reasoned match. Second, that he would work only with families who carried a specific subset for Type C mutation, known as IVS4,because it is the most common.And, last of all, the child being created must be wanted. (7). Doctors create these guidelines to create the maximum amount of productive work and results. Once again, proving that they should have the say as to how medical tec hnology is used. Slaters essay advocates this idea of setting guidelines before experimentation, To be qualified for neural implants he Mario had to exhaust every available pharmacological option at either optimal or above optimal doses and tolerate at least 20 hours of behavior therapy.He had to understand the risks and implications of the procedure and provide his consent. His case was viewed by three review board(238). It is shown that doctors are develop to take full control of a patients medical life in order to provide them with necessary aid. Others may see these procedures as detrimental to human health, however no doctor is licensed to harm his own patients. Slaters essay later states Dr Greenberg, his Mario psychiatrist said we dont want to repeat the mistakes of the past.We want to sure this therapy is not only used helter-skelter , but that it is reserved for the group of people who have failed trials of everything else(238). This shows that doctors have the comm ission to cure their patients. Although doctors provide accurate results , other may argue that doctors have too much control over the patients life. In Who holds the Clicker, a doctor by the name of Robert Heath studied forms of psychosurgery such as deeply brain stimulation , also knows as DBS. The method in which carried this quality of surgery is graphic and can be disturbing to the patients family members.Slater states Heath took patients culled from the back wards of Louisianas mental hospitals, slit open their skulls , and dropped electrodes down deep inside them . With the use of a handheld stimulator , Heath discovered that electrodes dictated in the hippocampus, the thalamus, or the tegmentum could produce states of rage or fear , while electrodes placed in the brains septal area and part of the amygdala could produce feelings of pleasure(235). Evidently, the language used in this summons is visual and does not sound pleasurable.These procedures are seen as immoral an d unethical by many patients and the public. To a certain extent the procedures of some experiments are unconscionable . Nonetheless, this paved a way for new science discoveries and benefited millions. Belkins tommyrot takes this issue a little lighter than Slaters. The mothers of Henry and Molly underwent the carry through of in-vitro fertilization every other month to try and conceive a newborn child. It was necessary to impregnate a child with a twin(a) tissue type. In spite of this hectic procedure , the mothers did not pass it .Even though the process affected their health and reproductivity , they still followed the doctors recommendation . They flew out to different clinics in different states to find a solution. Belkin states Lisa spent all 1999 trying to defy the odds. In January she produced 12 eggs, 2 of which were healthy matchesshe became with child(predicate) , then miscarried. In June she produced only four eggs , one of which was a match but did not result in a pregnancy. In September she produced eight eggs , six of which had Fanconi anemia the single health match was implanted , but again, her pregnancy test was negative(13).If there is a will there is a way to solve any problem no matter how difficult it is. Lisa , mother of Molly, kept trying and trying until she finally did become pregnant. This shows that trial and error, despite its vulgar imaging , still has the possibility of bringing positive results and changing someones life Also , as much as doctors know the procedure is harmful in some way to the body, they also know there is a way of rejuvenating the patients health. These doctors dont see a possibility of no.So why would anyone not allow doctors to have control of our medical lives? Dr. Wagner states Im here as the patients advocate , meaning Molly and Henry and all the other children in need of transplants . It is my obligation to push the envelope because I see how dark the other side can be . I see the results of a sibling transplanttheyre the easiest transplant to do(7). It is clear that doctors see potential way more than the patients and the families. They should be trusted even if the procedure involves surpassing boundaries and limits .When these limits are exceeded and pushed to its fullest potential results like saving Mollys life occur . Belkin states In the end , Mollys life was saved. That is the Nashes answer to people who question their right to manipulate nature . Their right springs form the difference between 30 percent and 85 percent the difference between Molly and Henry. That is also their answer to those who would urge the government to ban all embryo research because it harms unborn children . The research , they say ,saves children like Molly(17).Not only is it proven that the government is an obstacle in terms of funding research , but also the doctor here jeopardizes his own job . Ultimately , medical technology is a very brittle topic to discuss in terms of who contro ls it. Governments part to reckon is to fund the doctors who are guaranteed to establish new science . As further as the essays and my personal opinion goes , doctors are the ones to be given control . They should be able to regulate medical devices . With their recognizable knowledge and invariant background, it is safe to rely on doctors with your eyes closed.